Beach Profiles

11 Hrs. Dec 7.13 to 15 Hrs. Jan 14.14

Synoptic diagram showing position of usual measured upper beach profile between sand flat (S.E. left) and shelf of grassy blown sand (M.W. right) invaded by two surge tides in December 6 2013 (crossed squares placed above sand subsequently measured). Also shows the strandline position of the low neap tide of November 29 as a cross at -1.88 m within the usual box comparing the calm December 7 and stormy January 14 sediment levels around their similar -0.38 and -0.40 m strandline levels. Dotted area shows the rise in sediments on lower half of the beach slope worn down higher up on January 3. Horizontal scale from central datum in metres and vertical scale from +1.0 to -2.7 m.

14 Hrs. Oct 15.13 to 12 Hrs. Oct 28.13

St. Jude's Day storm, 0.52 m lower water than on October 15, similarly neap tide, beach gathering blown sand at top.

16 Hrs. Nov 3.13 to 16 Hrs. Nov 4.13

Two surge tides without much wind between these two times produced a transgressive sand slope with obscured gravel berms.

16 Hrs. Nov 6.13 to 10 Hrs. Nov 9.13

Spring tides coincident with smaller surges transgressed the grassland to +0.20 m in this interval before an ordinary windy spring tide redeveloped an upper beach pebble berm.

16 Hrs. Dec 5.13 to 11 Hrs Dec 7.13

Two larger surge tides in relatively calm and dry weather on Dec 6, followed by an ordinary recorded spring tide profile, with erosion of the upper beach dominant over deposition below since Dec 13.

11 Hrs. Dec 20.13 to 13 Hrs. Dec 24.13

Early Christmas Eve rain storm before final survey lowered the pebble area marked by squares in addition to the usual bare areas. Below the neap strandline, there is erosion above and deposition below by the sea itself.

14 Hrs. Dec 26.13 to 15 Hrs. Jan 2.14

Diagram includes Dec 28 profile that is nearly the same as the one measured after the Christmas storm and contrasts with erosion by the windy New Year's Day rainstorm during higher predicted tides.

15 Hrs. Jan 2.14 to 15 Hrs. Jan 3.14

Two spring tides with nearly dry S.W. winds on Jan 3rd produced major, simple pattern of upper beach erosion and dominant lower slope deposition from long shore drifting.

Shoeburyness East Beach erosion

Persistent south-west winds and rain have modified the macrotidal upper beach at the Boom in Shoeburyness (Essex, England) in the last half of 2013 and January 2014. Here the rail of the Boom and the onshore concrete 0.4 m square posts above it provide a basis for repeating measurement of sediment and strandline heights after corrections are made at each spot. The exact altitude of the datum line at the inshore end of the rail in 2013 is still unclear, but it is roughly 12 feet O.D. and 6.6 m above the local low water mark at -2.90 m O.D. used for tidal predictions at Southend Pier Head (6 km to W.S.W.). But the tidal range is likely to be less at the Boom where the Estuary is wider than at the Pier. There is a weather station at Shoeburyness which might be used to relate the beach observations to wind speeds and direction in a more exact way.

The Boom extends south-east from the beach at right angles to the general trend of it . Since it was built in its present form in 1950-51, a small peninsular of beach sand and gravel has developed under it, gathering more sediment by long-shore drift and wind saltation of the sand when a S.W. wind reinforces the strong ebb tide in the same direction. When the wind is from the N.E., as it was during the early months of 2013, long-fetch waves from the Netherlands produce erosion and drift in the opposite direction, often day to day. That needs to be considered as the partial explanation for the profile of the beach in early October 2013. The wide sandflats start 2.3 to 2.4 m vertically and 19 to 21 m laterally from my datum points.

But on a time-scale of a few years, there was a persistent ridge (or berm) of gravel built-up and resisting the predictable level of the highest tides (termed spring tides in a very confusing way since they occur every fortnight to some extent and not just in the spring as equinoxial tides). This was finally removed by predicted high tides with an unpredicted surge component to them, that also coincided with rain washing of the beach slope, in the night of November 3/4 and continued through November 5 and 6. These surges were not noticed by the press, unlike the two higher predicted tides with surge components also predicted by the meteorologists on December 6. It was interesting to note that the predicted spring tide of the previous afternoon was actually a neap tide at the boom, while the next one engulfed the grassy sand shelf to a negative distance of 15.54 m along the boom trend. Marked positions of the December 6 strandline wet sand limits were subsequently determined to be respectively 585 and 200 m above my datum vertically. But intermediate engulfed areas and the line of dead Sea Holly (Eryngium maritimum L.) rose to 646 and 696 mm there. The early November surges appeared to be roughly 9 inches (230 mm) above my datum in terms of water level on the boom but they only extended into the grass for a lateral distance of two metres. Judging from the profiles and observations of the actual beach as the transgressive tides in this relatively natural setting produce a sand slope of rather more even gradient.

The St. Jude's Day storm (St. Simon being unimplicated) on October 28 had the highest wind speeds of these events at Shoeburyness. They were coincident with the morning high tide and unlike most of the other events did not involve rain. It was, however, a very low predicted tide at the boom the impressive cliff cut into the lower beach gravel on the east side of Southend Pier was reduced to a slight notch partly obscured by blown sand by the time I measured the profile around noon G.M.T. The storm of January 3 2014 was coincident with the afternoon tide and made one think about the description by Francis Rogers of the same place viewed from H.M.S. Kingfisher during the real hurricane of December 7/8 1703 "all things appearing as dismal as death". The waves arriving at about 45° to the boom and the wind direction rose 400 mm below the boom datum. Each diagram of the upper beach exaggerates the slope by a factor of ten, the horizontal scale showing metres one to 20 from my datum and the vertical one 0.1 m units downwards from the boom rail inshore datum nearly to -2.3 m where the slope of fine sandy gravel flattens out (the fine graph paper squares being 100 and 10 mm respectively). The inshore tidal wet sand limit of the two tides are marked as horizontal lines which in reality would slope down offshore, to the south-east and the left, due to the ability of the sea to climb the slope as the waves broke. Vertical lines draw attention to places where no change in beach level took place between each pair of tides selected to bracket storms or surges. Where net deposition took place the space between the curves are marked with dots and where erosion or little change took place the space is left blank. Adding up the areas between the curves, without any vertical exogeration, one obtains a net area per unit shoreline length added to or lost from this part of East Beach. For the January 3 tides, this sum is 0.25 m2 lost from the retreating cliff, 0.55 m2 lost from the upper beach to the right of the neutral line and 1.59 m2 added to the tower part of the profile inclusive of an extension beyond it to the break of slope at 21.117 m on January 2 and 21.915 m on January 3 (4 pm) at much the same height (-2317mm). Presumably half the sand and gravel added to the lower slope had come from erosion the 0.5 km long open part of East Beach and the other half had just moved downhill.

Black-tailed Godwit at Southend

A Victorian book for bird egg collectors laments that the Black-tail Godwit Limosa limosa (L.) is "unrecorded as nesting in Britain since 1847 nearest nesting ground Iceland" and illustrates the egg on the same plate 16 as the actually extinct Great Auk Alca impennis "existent until 1840" (W. J. Gordon Eggs of British Birds). With a decline of egg collecting and shooting as hobbies, plus conservation of marshland habitats, the Black-tailed Godwit has returned to breed in England and I was able to see one stranded dead at Chester Avenue beach in Southend-on-Sea about 8 hours after the morning neap tide and the usual S.W. wind brought it in on January 24 2014. This bird species has or had a breeding range right around temperate grasslands. Since it also migrates south in winter, there is an interesting report of a skeleton preserved in ice at 4.9 km elevation on Mount Everest (Paul Geroudet 1954, Nos Oiseaux v. 22 p.254). Modern bird books tend not to want to describe them with the measurements required to identify these dead birds and yet it is important to record mortalities like that. I have therefore been trying to learn how to identify the birds seen on the Southend strandline and also record their positions for comparison with the orientations of dinosaurs etc. This particular bird had a remarkably long and straight bill of 100 mm length out of a total 140 mm head and bill length aligned with the bill pointing west on and along the Fucus strandline. The tip of the bill was black and the rest pale pin. Since the bill is made of keratin and originally used to probe soils for invertebrates, rather than conserved intertidal habitats, one can speculate that the black tip is harder and the straight bill less prone to bending or buckling failure than the curved bills Curlews Numenius arquata (L.) which I have seen stranded. May be the curlew uses the bill more like a device to push the grass apart, or in softer ground? Another question is raised by the plumage and dimensions of the rest of my find. It had stranded ventral-up with the wings half-folded and the grey legs and apparently unwebbed feet (the do have small webs however) extended straight south down the beach like the frog described earlier. The length from the top of the head to the tail with a black bar on it was 320 mm and to the tip of the feet 380 mm. The long legs and bill being bare are likely to have hung down more than they do in most birds buoyed by air in the feathers, and so acted like anchors or rudders during standing at a point where the tide moving east against the wind in Thorpe Bay reaches sand and a jetty on the west side blocks the wind. There was a small excavation in the anterior thorax probably made by a crow after stranding. Apart from that the feathers were intact and more brown, apart from the black wing and white bar, and grey areas on the head, than winter plumage illustrations suggest. It was therefore like the North American equivalent species or geographical subspecies the rare Hudsonian Godwit. However, the length when turned over and made straight was 17 inches (c. 430 mm), not the equivalent unstretched 13 inch tip of bill to tip of tail measurement given for the Hudsonian Godwit in Robbins et. al. 1966 Birds of North American, Golden Press N.Y. It seems likely that when retreated into the marshland habitat now favoured by conservation in Europe, the species became smaller in North America during the Ice Age/Ages when grassland was unavailable. It is remarkable how different the present bird fauna of eastern North America is to Eurasia at species or subspecies level and that can hardly be due to the Rocky Mountains when a bird like this can migrate each year over higher mountains to India.

Guillemot at Southend

I have been confused for some time about the black and white birds stranded at Southend which resembled the plumage and cited dimensions of Max Shearwwater Puffinus puffinus (Brünnich) more than the Guillemot Uria aalge (Pontoppidan). However, the latest find, at Hut 158 Thorpe Bay on the morning strandline of January 23 2014 showed the bill more clearly than the one in gravel at Shoeburyness on the afternoon strandline of September 30 2013. There was a nasal pore on the rear side of the upper bill rather than a tube nose in the middle of it and the tip of the bill was not curved into a hook. The first find arrived with a N.E. (112°) wind on a strandline trending 215° with the body and webbed feet behind it pointing towards 160°. It was largely ventral-up and facing S.E. into the waves, ab out 0.3 m from the wet limit of the strandline. The neck was however pointed inshore like the bill. When a flexible tape was placed along the resulting sinuosity, it gave an approximate tip of bill to tip of feet length of 16 inches (c. 485 mm). The plumage was entirely black and white, with a pale area around the eyes and a darker one on the tip of the head extending into the neck to some extent. The plumage of the latter find was the same and in that case it had nearly straight stranded dimensions on and along the strandline trending E.W., of 13 inches bill tip to tip of tail, and 16 inches bill tip to tip of grey webbed feet. They pointed west into the wind that day with the intact body again largely ventral-up. In The Seabirds of Britain and Ireland by Cramp et. al. (1974 Country Book Society) Guillemots are said to have an imperfectly known marine distribution in winter when their winter plumage illustration is similar to what I saw except that theirs shows a longer dark grey band under the eyes (pl. 1E). In their 1970 census, it did not return to breed anywhere nearer to Southend than the chalk cliffs of the Isle of Wight and Yorkshire. In summer, it is said to be brown with much less white on the head and evidently these feathers can be entirely molted before the end of September. In Brown et al. (2003, Tracks and Signs etc Helm Press, London), they are reported to molt from late June until the end of October in England.